Steps in real sequence
The work broken down as it is actually performed, including setup, access, the operation itself, and demobilization — the phases where a disproportionate share of incidents occur.

Safety Documentation
Activity hazard analyses written by definable feature of work — real sequence, real hazards, specific controls — so they get accepted by the reviewer and used by the foreman during pre-task planning.
The problem
An activity hazard analysis is supposed to break a definable feature of work into its steps, identify the hazards in each step, and state the controls that make the step survivable. Done well, it is the single most useful safety document on a project, because it is the only one written at the level the crew works.
Done the way it usually gets done, it is a copied file with the project name changed, a hazard column that says "struck by, caught between, slips trips falls," and a control column that says "use proper PPE, follow all applicable regulations, be aware of surroundings." A reviewer can reject that. Worse, a foreman can read it and learn nothing.
What goes wrong
What we deliver
The work broken down as it is actually performed, including setup, access, the operation itself, and demobilization — the phases where a disproportionate share of incidents occur.
Each hazard identified against the specific step that creates it, with the exposure described rather than a category label.
Elimination and engineering controls first, then administrative controls and PPE — with the system, the anchorage, the barricade, the permit, the equipment, and the inspection stated explicitly.
The equipment used in each step, the pre-use or periodic inspection it requires, and who performs it.
Competent and qualified person designations where the standards require them, plus the training and certifications the step demands.
Adjacent and overhead work, coordination requirements, and step-specific emergency and rescue provisions — including trench and fall rescue capability.
How the work runs
The owner or GC specification, required template, and the review and acceptance process — including any USACE-influenced format expectations.
Definable features of work identified, and a working session with the superintendent or foreman on actual sequence, crew, equipment, and access.
A draft you verify for accuracy, revised until it describes the work correctly and satisfies the review format.
Direction on using the AHA in pre-task planning, plus revisions when sequence, means, methods, or site conditions change.
Scopes we prepare AHAs for
Common questions
Related services
The project-level plan AHAs sit under.
The corporate programs AHA controls reference.
Verify the AHA controls are in place in the field.
Which standards a given activity triggers.
When an event traces back to task-level planning.
Personnel who keep AHAs current as the work changes.
Send the scope, the owner requirement or template, and your mobilization date. We will confirm the definable features of work and a realistic turnaround.
Nebraska-based · nationwide project support